No comment.

Dal video mi sembra che l'auto non abbia il terrain response della 4WD

 

 

O sei uno di quelli che crede a tutto quello che si dice su internet?

 

Questo è l'articolo completo: http://www.teknikensvarld.se/jeepmoosetest/

La casa ha risposto inviando i suoi "esperti", hanno riprodotto il test insieme a loro e la situazione non è cambiata.

Anche se per ipotesi fosse una 2x4 la reazione sarebbe comunque inammissibile.

 

Hai letto il risultato del test sull'impatto, slitte sedile e pressione dell'airbag almeno? Il video da te citato avvalora la tesi del mezzo grosso e pericoloso anche per gli occupanti.

Il test col volante attuato elettronicamente è poco veritiero, riusciresti a girarlo così in fretta?

 

Preferisco una prova effettuata da un pilota qualsiasi ad una effettuata da una macchina proprio perchè il tempo di reazione di un uomo è maggiormente indicativo dei tempi e soprattutto dei modi di reazione di un guidatore qualunque. Aggiungiamoci poi che molti guidatori non sono in grado di incrociare propriamente le mani o di eseguira una manovra d'anticipo ad hoc...

 

Nella descrizione del tuo vito emerge questo: Adult occupant

In the frontal impact, the driver's inboard seat rail was found to have very nearly broken in two, and was mainly held
together only by the threaded steel rod which controls fore-aft adjustment of the seat. The break occurred just at the
point where the lower anchorage for the driver's seat belt attaches to the rail, and is thought to have been caused by
the high tensile forces in the belt during the test. As a result, there was additional forward movement of the dummy
which contributed to 'bottoming out' of the airbag i.e. there was insufficient pressure in the airbag to prevent the
driver's head from making contact, through the fabric of the airbag, with the steering wheel rim. Euro NCAP has been
informed that Jeep are investigating the cause of the seat rail failure and intend to improve the seat track design, but
have no current plans to re-work existing vehicles. Although dummy readings were good, structures in the dashboard
were thought to present a risk of injury to the knees and femurs of occupants of different sizes and to those sat in
different positions. Maximum points were scored in the side barrier test but, in the more severe side pole impact,
protection of the chest was rated as marginal. The Grand Cherokee has an 'active' head restraint which senses when
a rear-end impact has occurred and moves the restraint forward to minimise the time to restrain head movement.
Jeep showed that the system responded in a broad range of accident severities, and the whiplash tests were
performed with the system active. Nevertheless, the protection provided against neck injuries in a rear-end collision
was rated as marginal.

Child occupant

In the frontal impact, the 3 year dummy did not move forward excessively. However, on rebound, the dummy's head
contacted the trim on the rear door pillar and the car lost all points for protection of the 3 year dummy in that test. The
passenger airbag cannot be disabled so a rearward facing child restraint should not be used in that seating position.
The dangers of doing so are not clearly labelled in the car.

Pedestrian

The bumper provided good protection in all areas tested and scored maximum points. However, the front edge of the
bonnet was poor in all areas tested. In almost all areas likely to be struck by the head of a child, the bonnet provided
poor protection. However, protection provided to an adult's head was mixed with areas of good and poor protection.

Safety assist

Electronic stability control is standard equipment on the Grand Cherokee and met Euro NCAP's test requirements. A
seatbelt reminder system is standard equipment for the driver and front passenger seats. A sped limitation device is
not offered on the Grand Cherokee.

 

Tradotto: una bara su ruote.

Poi visto che come al solito vuoi avere l'ultima parola e visto che alla mia veneranda età ho di meglio da fare che discutere se un FUORISTRADA da 2000kg sia una buona auto in base alla sua capacità di fare una chicane in velocità ti lascio con la personale convinzione che in caso d'incidente spero comunque di trovarmi su una Grand Cherooke e non su una Panda (5* ENCAP)